A California recruitment firm owner allegedly required employees to search an adult-oriented website for male masseuses willing to provide in-home services with highly personal elements, according to a lawsuit filed by a former worker. The suit describes repeated exposure to explicit content and pressure to deliver candidates despite repeated refusals from providers. It also outlines subsequent workplace changes that the plaintiff says amounted to retaliation. The case centers on events at Kossoris Search Inc., an LA-based legal recruiting company.
Details of the Assignment
The complaint states that in May 2025, owner Amy Kossoris instructed staff to locate an at-home male massage therapist through Masseurfinder.com, a directory focused on LGBTQI-friendly providers. Employees were told to identify someone prepared to perform specific and highly personal services. Workers reportedly had to review sexually explicit listings and communicate directly with potential providers about those details. One employee, Kaynaz Farhood, said the company’s internet filters blocked the site, forcing her to use a personal device. The suit claims the assignment exposed staff to inappropriate material that crossed professional lines.
Provider Responses and Internal Pushback
Multiple masseuses declined the requests, citing safety concerns tied to reports of Kossoris’s past physically and verbally aggressive behavior, the filing alleges. Employees raised objections in June 2025. Management reportedly directed them to continue the search but to avoid the original website and instead use other platforms while screening candidates themselves. Farhood described feeling deeply uncomfortable and noted that the task blurred boundaries between work duties and personal requests. The suit indicates that a manager later warned staff they risked termination unless they supplied multiple screened options daily and handled anonymous advertising.
Workplace Changes and Resignation
After the complaints, Farhood was reassigned to cold-calling duties, lost her office, and was required to work from a hallway under surveillance cameras, according to the documents. She also claims Kossoris publicly stated in front of colleagues that Farhood did not deserve an office. Farhood resigned in September 2025. The lawsuit seeks damages and attorney fees. It portrays the sequence of events as retaliation for raising concerns about the assignment.
Company Background and Current Status
Kossoris Search Inc. describes its founder as an established legal recruiter with more than two decades of experience placing candidates at top law firms. The firm’s site emphasizes that Kossoris personally handles every placement. The company has not issued a public response to the allegations in the filing. The suit remains pending in court, and no findings of liability have been made. The case highlights questions about workplace boundaries when personal requests intersect with professional responsibilities. It also underscores how employees may face difficult choices when assignments involve content or tasks they find inappropriate.
AI Disclaimer: This article was created with the assistance of AI tools and reviewed by a human editor.